Christopher Sherman v. Albertsons LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20242:23-cv-06377California4,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 CHRISTOPHER SHERMAN et al., Case № 2:23-cv-06377-ODW (RAOx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v.

CLASS CERTIFICATION [30]

14 ALBERTSON’S, LLC et al.

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Christoper Sherman, Peter Ruiz, Richard Ancheta, and Michael 19 Raziano bring this putative class action against Defendant Albertson’s LLC, asserting 20 claims for invasion of privacy and violation of California wage and hour laws. (First 21 Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 26.) Plaintiffs now move for class certification 22 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule” or “Rules”) 23(b)(1)(A), 23 23(b)(2), and 23(b)(3). (Mot. Class Certification (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 30.) 24 The Motion is fully briefed. (See Opp’n, ECF No. 36; Reply, ECF No. 39.) For the 25 reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion.1 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.