22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T433,JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 24-6067-JFW(KSx) Date: August 13, 2024 Title: Mark Oravetz-v- Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, et al. PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Based on the Declaration of Amy C. Hirsch Regarding Meet and Confer Efforts, filed August 9, 2024 (Docket No. 15-1), Plaintiff Mark Oravetz (“Plaintiff”) has failed to participate in the filing of the Joint Report required by the Court's Order of July 19, 2024. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-88 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). IT IS SO ORDERED.24:T476,

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-6067-JFW(KSx) Date: August 13, 2024 Title: Mark Oravetz-v- Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, et al.

PRESENT:

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None None

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Based on the Declaration of Amy C. Hirsch Regarding Meet and Confer Efforts, filed August 9, 2024 (Docket No. 15-1), Plaintiff Mark Oravetz (“Plaintiff”) has failed to participate in the filing of the Joint Report required by the Court's Order of July 19, 2024. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-88 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992).

IT IS SO ORDERED.