Sam Benford v. Ignacio A. Arrincon
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20245:24-cv-01522California927 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 Case No.: 5:24-cv-01522-MEMF-SP SAM BENFORD,
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO
v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S
STATE LAW CLAIMS
IGNACIO A. ARRINCON D/B/A MEXICO
TIRES; ISIDRO GUARDADO; and DOES 1 to
10,
Defendants.
On July 22, 2024, Plaintiff Sam Benford (“Benford”) filed a Complaint against Defendants
Ignacio A. Arrincon D/B/A/ Mexico Tires, and Isidro Guardado, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the Cal. Health & Safety Code…