Sam Benford v. Ignacio A. Arrincon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20245:24-cv-01522California927 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 5:24-cv-01522-MEMF-SP SAM BENFORD,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

IGNACIO A. ARRINCON D/B/A MEXICO

TIRES; ISIDRO GUARDADO; and DOES 1 to

10,

Defendants.

On July 22, 2024, Plaintiff Sam Benford (“Benford”) filed a Complaint against Defendants

Ignacio A. Arrincon D/B/A/ Mexico Tires, and Isidro Guardado, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the Cal. Health & Safety Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.