Brooke O'Donnell v. Crocs Retail, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20242:24-cv-02726California3,178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

Two motions are presently before the Court. The first is a motion to remand this action to State court filed by Plaintiffs Brooke O’Donnell, Shantriece Mitchell, Qunae Wilkerson, Claudia Retana, and Maria Monterroso (“Plaintiffs”). The second is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Crocs Retail, LLC (“Defendant” or “Crocs”). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED and Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.

IL. Factual and Procedural Background A. Procedural History Plaintiffs filed this class action lawsuit against Defendant on February 28, 2024, in state court. Notice of Removal, Ex. 1 (Compl.), ECF No. 1-1. Defendant removed this case to federal court on April 4, 2024. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on May 31, 2024. First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 16. On July 1, Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand this case to state court. That same day, Defendant moved to dismiss this case.

Initials of Preparer PMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

No. 2:24-cv-02726-SVW-PD Date “August 15, 2024

Title Brooke O'Donnell et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.