Daniel Seegmiller v. 3M Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20242:24-cv-06755California942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-6755-JFW(SSCx) Date: August 19, 2024 Title: Daniel Seegmiller, et al. -v- 3M Company, et al.

PRESENT:

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None None

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD

NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION

On July 9, 2024, Plaintiffs Daniel Seegmiller and Ann Seegmiller (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against approximately forty defendants in Los Angeles Superior Court (“LASC”). On August 9, 2024, Defendant Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (“Buffalo Pumps”) filed a Notice of Removal, alleging that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.