Dandan Zhang v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20242:24-cv-05849California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANDAN ZHANG, Case No. 2:24-cv-05849-SB-PD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff filed this case on July 11, 2024. Dkt. No. 1. On July 17, 2024, the Court issued an order titled “Notice to Self-Represented Litigant” that explained the service requirements for prosecuting a case against the government and set a status conference for August 16, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6C, with a report on the progress of service due by August 9, 2024. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff failed to file her report. Plaintiff further failed to appear at the status conference on August 16. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 requires parties to appear at conferences ordered by the Court and grants the Court authority to sanction parties for failure to appear. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a), (f).

Moreover, this complaint in this case appears to be materially identical to the complaint Plaintiff filed earlier this year in Case. No. 5:24-cv-00117-JGB-SHK, which was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a stipulation of the parties on April 17, 2024. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.