Antoinette Hanson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ANTOINETTE HANSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-02534-MRA-JC Plaintiff, Hon. Mónica Ramirez Almadani Hon. Magistrate Jacqueline Chooljian v.

MERRICK BANK CORPORATION, PROTECTIVE ORDER

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION,

15 LLC, and DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE, 16 Defendants. 17 18 1. GENERAL 1. Purposes and Limitations. Defendants have represented that discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Defendants moved to have the Court enter a Protective Order. (Docket No. 41). Plaintiff did not file an opposition to such motion and the Court deemed such lack of opposition consent to the granting of the motion and granted the motion on that basis, indicating that it would issue a modified version of Defendants’ Proposed Protective Order, which the Court 1 …