Gary S. Hann v. Wallace P. Pitchford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—
GENERAL
Case No. 5:23-cv-02381-SSS-SHKx Date August 21, 2024 Title Gary S. Hann v. Wallace P. Pitchford, et al.
Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANTS WALLACE P. PITCHFORD AND
PAMELA PALMIERI SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
On July 16, 2024, Plaintiff Gary S. Hann moved for entry of default judgment against Wallace P. Pitchford and numerous Doe defendants. [Dkt. 62]. In support of his motion, Hann offers a declaration in which he attests that “Wallace P. Pitchford died on 1/28/24.” [Id. at 5]. However, Hann cannot maintain claims against a dead person. LN Management, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 957 F.3d 943, 954 (9th Cir. 2020) (“We therefore join our sister circuits in holding that a party cannot maintain a suit on behalf of, or again, or join, a dead person, or…