Jamie Torres v. Ralphs Grocery Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20242:24-cv-03906California838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-03906-MEMF-SK JAMIE TORRES,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, an Ohio corporation; and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

On May 9, 2024, Plaintiff Jamie Torres (“Torres”) filed a Complaint against Defendants

Ralphs Grocery Company, an Ohio corporation, and Does 1-10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101; and (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 51 et seq. The Complaint alleges that this Court has jurisdiction over the ADA claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, and that the state law claims are brought pursuant to supplemental jurisdiction. Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.