Ricardo M. Somoza v. Central Juvenile Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO M. SOMOZA, Case No. 2:22-cv-08538-SPG (BFM)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

CENTRAL JUVENILE HALL, et al.,

JUDGE

Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaints, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends dismissal of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint without further leave to amend and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 31.) As explained below, Plaintiff’s objections to the Report (ECF No. 42) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendations. Plaintiff objects that his “rights were violated by Defendants near[ly] 50 years ago[.]” (ECF No. 42 at 1.) This objection…