Paul Navarrete Quintana v. Cynthia E. Lermond

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20242:24-cv-03524California971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENCTIRVAILL DMIISNTURTICETS O– FG CEANLEIRFAOLR NIA

Paul Navarrete Quintana. v. Cynthia Lermond, et al. Case No. 2:24-cv-03524-WLH-PD Date: August 22, 2024 T itle Present: The Honorable: Patricia Donahue, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Isabel Verduzco N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why the Complaint Should Not be Dismissed as Duplicative

On April 25, 2024, Plaintiff Paul Navarrete Quintana (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“the Complaint”) and a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 (the “2024 Case”).] The Complaint names Cynthia Lermond, Melisa Jones, Nicole Paglione, Melinda Wolbransky, Dae Peter Lee, Rae Huebner, Ashley Cabadas, Lisa Real, Kimberly Clabbet, Meredith Michaels, psychologists at Gateways Hospital and Mental Health Center (“Gateways Hospital”), a California Department of State Hospitals (“DSH”) facility, and Johnny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.