In re: Prime Healthcare ERISA Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20248:20-cv-01529California18,693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 In re: Prime Healthcare ERISA Litig. Case No. 8:20-cv-1529-JLS-JDE

FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

15

22

28 The Court held a bench trial from April 9, 2024, through April 16, 2024. Having considered the testimony presented at trial, the exhibits admitted into evidence, and the parties’ post-trial submissions, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. The Court concludes that Defendants used a prudent process to select, monitor, and retain investments; to monitor the Plan’s recordkeeping and administration fees; and to monitor the share classes of the investments in the Plan. Therefore, the Court rules against Plaintiffs2 and in favor of Defendants3 on all of Plaintiffs’ claims. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Prime owns and operates hospitals and clinics in fourteen states. (FPTC Order, Doc. 196 ¶ 6.) Prime sponsors the Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the 12 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.