Jimmie E. Stephens v. Warden J. Schultz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20242:24-cv-06327California1,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-06327-DOC-AJR Date: August 22, 2024 Page 1 of

Title: Jimmie E. Stephens v. Warden J. Schultz et al.,

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT

OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) OR

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

HABEAS CLAIM

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_ Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PETITIONER: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR RESPONDENTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On July 19, 2024, Jimmie E. Stephens (“Petitioner”), a pro se state prisoner currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) at California State Prison Solano, in Vacaville, CA (“CSP-Solano”), constructively filed1 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) The Petition appears to challenge CDCR’s Board of Parole

1 Under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.