Jimmie E. Stephens v. Warden J. Schultz
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20242:24-cv-06327California1,744 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-06327-DOC-AJR Date: August 22, 2024 Page 1 of
Title: Jimmie E. Stephens v. Warden J. Schultz et al.,
DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD
NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) OR
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE
HABEAS CLAIM
PRESENT:
HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
_ Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PETITIONER: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR RESPONDENTS:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)
On July 19, 2024, Jimmie E. Stephens (“Petitioner”), a pro se state prisoner currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) at California State Prison Solano, in Vacaville, CA (“CSP-Solano”), constructively filed1 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) The Petition appears to challenge CDCR’s Board of Parole
1 Under the…