Ana Ventura v. Tripact, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20248:24-cv-01821California926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 8:24-cv-01821-MEMF-KES ANA VENTURA,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

TRIPACT, INC.; GRAHAM REAL

15 ESTATE COMPANY, LLC; and DOES 1 16 to 10, 17 Defendants.

20 On August 19, 2024, Plaintiff Ana Ventura (“Ventura”) filed a Complaint against Defendants

21 Tripact, Inc., Graham Real Estate Company, LLC, and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for 22 injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 23 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act 24 (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California 25 Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief 26 pursuant to the Cal. Health & Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; and (5)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.