Edmond Neal v. Diane M. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20242:24-cv-06377California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. _CV 24-6377-DMG (JPRx) Date August 23, 2024 Title Edmond Neal v. Diane M. Adams, et al. Page 1 of2

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KELLY DAVIS NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attommeys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT

SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (‘“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. sections 12010- 12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code sections 51-53. It appears that the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act, Disabled Persons Act, Health & Safety…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.