Jesse Washington v. A. Lakowski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JESSE WASHINGTON, Case No. 2:22-cv-00619-FMO-JC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

A. LASKOWSKI, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in connection with Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”), along with all of the records herein, including the June 11, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation” or “R&R”) and Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has also considered Defendants’ response to the Objections and Plaintiff’s reply to the response. The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants’ Motion be granted as to Claims Two through Five of Plaintiff’s operative First Amended Complaint 28 …