Tyi Rai Francis v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20242:23-cv-07594California8,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 TYI RAI F., Case No. CV 23-07594-AS Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION

v. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

18 For the reasons discussed below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed. 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff’s name is partly redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. PROCEEDINGS 2 On September 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (Dkt. No. 1). On November 13, 2023, Defendant filed an Answer consisting of the Administrative Record (“AR”). (Dkt. No. 11). The parties subsequently filed opposing …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.