Jim L. Banks v. The Pacific Crest Trail Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20248:23-cv-01026California252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1

JS-

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIM L. BANKS, Case No. SACV 23-1026-MWF (SSC)

Plaintiff

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

THE PACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On July 16, 2024, the Court granted Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff’s existing due process claim based on the handling of his administrative complaint, dismissed with prejudice Defendant Holzworth from the action, and dismissed Plaintiff’s equal protection claim with leave to amend. (Docket No. 43). The Court allowed Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”) no later than July 30, 2024. (Id.). To date, Plaintiff has not filed a SAC or otherwise responded to the Court’s Order. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962). /// /// /// This Order shall constitute notice of entry of judgment pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.