Marquise Bailey v. Silvestre Madrigal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-06665-MEMF-PVC MARQUISE BAILEY,
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO
v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S
STATE LAW CLAIMS SILVESTRE MADRIGAL; and DOES 1 to 10, 15 Defendants.
On August 7, 2024, Plaintiff Marquise Bailey filed a Complaint against Defendants Silvestre
Madrigal, and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51– 52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 19955, et seq.; and (5) a claim for negligence. ECF No. 1. The…