Daniel Seegmiller v. 3M Company
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20242:24-cv-06755California373 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No. CV 24-6755-JFW(SSCx) Date: August 30, 2024 Title: Daniel Seegmiller, et al. -v- 3M Company, et al.
PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
THE COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On July , 2024, Plaintiffs Daniel Seegmiller and Ann Seegmiller (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against approximately forty defendants in Los Angeles Superior Court (“LASC”). Docket No. 1-1. On August 9, 2024, Defendant Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (“Buffalo Pumps”) filed a Notice of Removal, alleging that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). Docket No. 1. On August 19, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”), ordering Buffalo Pumps to demonstrate why the Court should not remand this action…