Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd v. B612 Tima Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20245:23-cv-01628California677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case EDCV 23-1628 JGB (DTBx) Date August 28, 2024 Title Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd. v. B612 Tima Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

___MAYNORGALVEZ _____NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute (IN CHAMBERS)

On July 5, 2023, Plaintiff Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants B612 Tima Inc. (“B612”), Best Bay Logistics Inc. (“Best Bay”), and Rail Dog Trucking LLC (“Rail Dog’’) (collectively, ““Defendants”) in the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1-2.) On August 11, 2023, Defendants removed the action to this Court. (“Notice of Removal,” Dkt. No. 1.) On August 18, 2023, Best Bay filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint. (“MTD,” Dkt. No. 9.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.