Brian Alexander v. Big Time US, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20242:24-cv-04429California1,371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:24-cv-04429 HDV MARx

BRIAN ALEXANDER,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. NO. 16] 13 v.

BIG TIME US, LLC; INSPERITY PEO

SERVICES, LP; BIG TIME STUDIOS, LTD; THOR ALEXANDER; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Brian Alexander brings this employment discrimination action against Defendants Big Time US, LLC (“BTU”), Insperity PEO Services, LP (“Insperity”), Big Time Studios, LTD (“BTS”), and Thor Alexander (collectively, “Defendants”). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (“Motion”), which argues that Defendants’ removal was untimely. [Dkt. No. 16]. The Motion also seeks remand on the basis that Defendants have not established complete diversity because BTU is a California citizen. The Motion is denied. The Court finds that Defendants’ removal was timely and that BTU is not a citizen of California. The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.