Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC v. Sequoia Capital LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20248:24-cv-01396California565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. SA CV 24-1396 FMO (PDx) Date September 3, 2024 Title Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC v. Sequoia Capital LLC

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Re: Striking Stipulation and Order to Show Cause The court has reviewed the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (Dkt. 18, “Stipulation”), by which the parties stipulate to extend the time for defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (See id. at 2). The Stipulation is signed by David Liao (“Liao”) on behalf of defendant Sequoia Capital LLC. (See id. at 3). However, Liao, a non- attorney, may not file any papers or appear on behalf of an entity defendant. It is well-settled that corporations and other business entities cannot appear pro se in federal court; they must be represented by licensed counsel. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.