Kenneth Davidson v. AT and T Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20242:24-cv-07050California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-07050-MEMF-AGR KENNETH DAVIDSON,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

AT&T CORP.; TOM SEE QUAN, AS

TRUSTEE OF THE TOM SEE QUAN AND

LOUISA P.F. QUAN REVOCABLE TRUST; and DOES 1 to 10, 17 Defendants.

20 On August 20, 2024, Plaintiff Kenneth Davidson ( “Davidson”) filed a Complaint against 21 Defendants AT&T Corp., Tom See Quan, as Trustee of the Tom See Quan and Louisa P.F. Quan 22 Revocable Trust, and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an 23 alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq.; (2) a 24 claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 25 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. 26 Code § 54, et seq.; (4)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.