Syed Arif Hussain Mosavi v. Rena Bitter

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20242:24-cv-01769California2,536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

United States District Court Central District of California

14 SYED ARIF HUSSAIN MOSAVI, Case № 2:24-cv-01769-ODW (AJRx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. 17 R ENA BITTER et al., MOTION TO DISMISS [10]

18 Defendants.

19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Syed Arif Hussain Mosavi brings this mandamus action against 22 Defendants Rena Bitter, Andrew Schofer, and Antony Blinken (“Defendants”) in their 23 official capacities as Assistant Secretary Bureau of Consular Affairs, Deputy Chief of 24 Mission for the United States Embassy in Pakistan, and Secretary of State for the 25 United States Department of State, respectively. (Compl. ¶¶ 14–17, ECF No. 1.) 26 Mosavi seeks to compel adjudication of his wife’s I-130 visa application. (Id. ¶ 1.) 27 Defendants now move to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or 1 “Mot.”) 1, ECF No. 10.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion.1 II.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.