InMode Ltd. v. DHGate Seller

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20248:24-cv-01803California3,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 InMode Ltd., and Invasix Inc. Case No. SACV 24-1803-MWF(ADSx) 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY v. INJUNCTION 13 DHGate Seller “abfl”, et al. 14 Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs InMode Ltd. and Invasix Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs” or “InMode”) Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“PI”) against Defendants. The Court held oral argument on Plaintiffs’ motion on August 28, 2024. Having reviewed the papers and heard oral argument and reviewed the evidence in support of or against the motion, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiffs are the registered owner and exclusive United States distributor of Morpheus®-branded microneedling products used in aesthetic skin care. InMode owns numerous trademarks used in connection with the manufacture and distribution of InMode’s Morpheus® brand microneedling devices and needle cartridge …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.