Silvia Meraz v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20242:24-cv-06061California2,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SILVIA MERAZ, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-06061-FLA (ASx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

et al., Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULING On July 19, 2024, Plaintiffs Silvia Meraz and Jessenia Meraz (“Plaintiffs”) filed the Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, asserting three causes of action against Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Nissan”) for violations of the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the “Song- Beverly Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1790, et seq., and one cause of action for fraudulent inducement. Dkt. 1-1 at 27–34.1 As relevant here, Plaintiffs seek actual damages, civil penalties, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees and costs. Id. at 35. On July 19, 2024, Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.