Brenda Mendoza v. Marriott International Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20242:24-cv-04120California3,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRENDA MENDOZA, individually, Case No. 2:24-cv-04120-AB-JPR and on behalf of all members of the general public similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND [19]

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC.,

a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 15 through 10, inclusive,

16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Brenda Mendoza’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 19). Defendant Marriott International Inc. (“Defendant”) filed an opposition (Dkt. No. 22) and Plaintiff filed a reply (Dkt. No. 24). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On March 20, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this action against Defendant in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. See Compl. (Dkt. No. 1-2). Defendant employed Plaintiff from January 2010 to present. Compl. ¶ 18. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to pay minimum and overtime wages, provide meal and rest periods, pay final wages, provide accurate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.