Babak Moeinolmoki v. Lone Star Alliance, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20242:24-cv-04851California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BABAK MOEINOLMOLKI, et al., ) Case No. CV 24-4851 FMO (MRWx) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE LONE STAR ALLIANCE, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 16 Plaintiffs filed their complaint on June 9, 2024 (Dkt. 1). By order dated August 27, 2024, plaintiffs were ordered to show cause, on or before September 3, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiffs’ failure to complete service of the summons and complaint as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Dkt. 9, Court’s Order of August 27, 2024). Plaintiffs were admonished that “[f]ailure to file a timely response to th[e] Order to Show Cause shall result in the action . . . being dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court.” (Id.). As of the date of this Order, plaintiffs have not filed proofs of service of the summons and complaint on any defendant. (See,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.