C.J. Segerstrom and Sons v. Lexington Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20248:22-cv-00466California1,463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 8:22-cv-00466-MEMF-JDEx

C.J. SEGERSTROM AND SONS,

14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 56(f) v.

17 LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 20

22 Before the Court are the parties’ briefs regarding the Court’s notice of intent to grant summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff on Defendant’s Fourth and Sixth Affirmative Defenses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f). ECF Nos. 95, 96. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS summary judgment to the Sixth Affirmative Defense only. / / / / / / I. Factual & Procedural Background Plaintiff C.J. Segerstrom & Sons (“Segerstrom”) owns and operates a shopping mall (the “South Coast Plaza”). Segerstrom purchased commercial property insurance for South Coast Plaza from Defendant Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”). This case concerns Lexington’s denial of coverage under the applicable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.