Mina Boules v. United States of America; Federal Protective Service
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
This is an action arising from an incident between pro se Plaintiff Mina Boules, an attorney who arrived at a federal building to assist a client in an immigration matter involving a deportation hearing, and security guards at that federal building. (Dkt. No. 51 FAC”), 9] 13-16.) Plaintiff brings the following claims in his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”): (1) a Bivens claim for unlawful and unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment against Defendants Lott,’ Paragon Systems, Inc. (“Paragon”), Sandoval, Doe 5, and Does 51-100: (2) a Bivens claim for violation of due process under the Fifth Amendment against Defendants Lott, Paragon, Sandoval, Doe 5, and Does 51-100; (3) a Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) claim for battery against all Defendants: (4) an FTCA claim for assault against all Defendants; (5) an FTCA claim for false imprisonment against all Defendants; (6) an FTCA claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against all Defendants; (7) an FTCA claim for abuse of process against all Defendants; (8) an FTCA claim for negligence against all Defendants; 1 Defendant Lott is sued in his personal capacity under all causes of action…