Broque Anthony Anderson v. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20245:24-cv-01861California1,837 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BROQUE ANTHONY Case No. 5:24-cv-01861-JAK-KES

ANDERSON,

12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 13 v. PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY JURISDICTION

SHERIFF DEPARTMENT,

Respondent.

18 On August 29, 2024, Broque Anthony Anderson (“Petitioner”) filed a pro se 19 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a P erson in State Custody under 28 U.S.C. 20 § 2254 (the “Petition”), challenging his state court convictions for second-degree 21 burglary. (Dkt. 1 at 2.) The Court issues this Order to Show Cause directed to 22 Petitioner because it appears he is no longer in custody for the convictions he is 23 challenging, and thus the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. 24 I.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY.

26 A. State Court Proceedings. 27 On March 18, 2022, a San Bernardino County Superior Court jury in case 28 number FWV21003849 convicted Petitioner of two counts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.