Sam Benford v. First Metro, LLC
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20242:24-cv-07187California595 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Sees 2:24cv-07187MCS PD Re September 16, 2024 Title Benford v. First Metro, LLC
Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge
Stephen Montes Kerr —__——NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(B) (JS-6)
On August 26, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims presented in the complaint. (OSC, ECF No. 10.) The Court warned that failure to respond to the OSC “may, without further warning, result in the Court’s dismissal of the entire action without prejudice, or the Court’s declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction.” (/d. at 2.) Plaintiff did not submit a timely response. A district court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to comply with court orders. Fed.…