Sam Benford v. First Metro, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20242:24-cv-07187California595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Sees 2:24cv-07187MCS PD Re September 16, 2024 Title Benford v. First Metro, LLC

Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge

Stephen Montes Kerr —__——NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(B) (JS-6)

On August 26, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims presented in the complaint. (OSC, ECF No. 10.) The Court warned that failure to respond to the OSC “may, without further warning, result in the Court’s dismissal of the entire action without prejudice, or the Court’s declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction.” (/d. at 2.) Plaintiff did not submit a timely response. A district court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to comply with court orders. Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.