Gary Grant Hampton, Jr. v. J. Morales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY G. HAMPTON, JR., Case No. 2:23-cv-04296-SB-AJR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

J. MORALES, ET AL., STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 64, “Motion/Request to Object”). Though objecting generally, asserting that he is entitled to a jury trial on the claims in his Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has failed to raise any substantive, specific objection to the Report and Recommendation (R&R). Dkt. No. 64. The Court, therefore, need not conduct a de novo review of the R&R and adopts its findings and conclusions on that ground. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (requiring that a party “file specific written objections”…