Argishti Tigranyan v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20242:24-cv-00741California4,520 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ARGISHTI TIGRANYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00741-SPG-RAO 11 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE v. ORDER1

MERRICK B. GARLAND,

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., 15 Defendants.

18 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 19 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 20 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 21 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 22 be warranted, including case-specific, asylum-related, or private information 23 relating to Plaintiff. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the 24 Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge 25 that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 26 27 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.