Pim Shih v. Mitsuwa Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20242:24-cv-03134California744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. _ CV 24-3134 WLH (PVC) Date: September 17, 2024 Title Pim Shih v. Mitsuwa Corporation

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION

Pim Shih (“Plaintiff”), a New Jersey resident proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action against Mitsuwa Corporation (“Defendant”), alleging that Defendant, at its Edgewater, New Jersey store, violated Plaintiff's civil rights under Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, which prohibits religious discrimination in places of public accommodation. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). The Complaint is subject to dismissal, however, for lack of jurisdiction. Section 2000a requires that Title II plaintiffs give prior notice to state or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.