Pim Shih v. Mitsuwa Corporation
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20242:24-cv-03134California744 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL
Case No. _ CV 24-3134 WLH (PVC) Date: September 17, 2024 Title Pim Shih v. Mitsuwa Corporation
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION
Pim Shih (“Plaintiff”), a New Jersey resident proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action against Mitsuwa Corporation (“Defendant”), alleging that Defendant, at its Edgewater, New Jersey store, violated Plaintiff's civil rights under Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, which prohibits religious discrimination in places of public accommodation. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). The Complaint is subject to dismissal, however, for lack of jurisdiction. Section 2000a requires that Title II plaintiffs give prior notice to state or…