Kyler Cairns v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLER CAIRNS, et al., Case No. 5:24-cv-01553-FLA (SHKx)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR
v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
17 RULING On June 12, 2024, Plaintiffs Kyler Cairns and Natalie Taylor (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the Riverside County Superior Court, asserting against Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) three causes of action for violations of the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the “Song-Beverly Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1790, et seq. Dkt. 1-2 (“Compl.”). As relevant here, Plaintiffs seeks actual damages, civil penalties, and attorney’s fees and costs. Id. at 9. On May 29, 2024, Defendant removed the action to this court, alleging the existence of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Dkt. 1 (“NOR”) at 3–5.…