Anne Heiting v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20242:23-cv-08002California4,689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

11 ANNE HEITING, ) Case No. 2:23-cv-08002-SPG-E ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ) PROTECTIVE ORDER v. ) ) TARO PHARMACEUTICALS ) Judge: Hon. Honorable Charles F. Eick U.S.A., INC., et al., ) Courtroom: 5C ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.