Anne Heiting v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20242:23-cv-08002California4,689 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
11 ANNE HEITING, ) Case No. 2:23-cv-08002-SPG-E ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ) PROTECTIVE ORDER v. ) ) TARO PHARMACEUTICALS ) Judge: Hon. Honorable Charles F. Eick U.S.A., INC., et al., ) Courtroom: 5C ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket…