Ronnie Parham v. City of West Covina

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20242:21-cv-09114California735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNIE PARHAM, Case No. 2:21-cv-09114-FLA (GJSx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ONE OR MORE CLAIMS SHOULD

NOT BE STAYED PENDING APPEAL

CITY OF WEST COVINA, et al.,

OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY ISSUES

Defendants. [DKT. 72]

17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On August 21, 2024, Defendants Officer N. Robles, Officer Carlos Gonzalez, Officer A. Hernandez, and Officer Matthew Muñoz (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a notice of appeal (“Notice of Appeal”), Dkt. 72, from the court’s order denying Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, including on the issue of qualified immunity, Dkt. 71. “Ordinarily a denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final order and thus is not appealable.” Liberal v. Estrada, 632 F.3d 1064, 1073–74 (9th Cir. 2011) (cleaned up). “[H]owever, a district court’s denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.