Ronnie Parham v. City of West Covina
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNIE PARHAM, Case No. 2:21-cv-09114-FLA (GJSx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v. ONE OR MORE CLAIMS SHOULD
NOT BE STAYED PENDING APPEAL
CITY OF WEST COVINA, et al.,
OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY ISSUES
Defendants. [DKT. 72]
17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On August 21, 2024, Defendants Officer N. Robles, Officer Carlos Gonzalez, Officer A. Hernandez, and Officer Matthew Muñoz (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a notice of appeal (“Notice of Appeal”), Dkt. 72, from the court’s order denying Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, including on the issue of qualified immunity, Dkt. 71. “Ordinarily a denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final order and thus is not appealable.” Liberal v. Estrada, 632 F.3d 1064, 1073–74 (9th Cir. 2011) (cleaned up). “[H]owever, a district court’s denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of…