Vladimir Royter v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20242:24-cv-06484California4,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — WESTERN DIVISION 11 $ VLADIMIR ROYTER, Case No. 2:24-cv-06484-FLA-PVCx Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

CORPORATION and DOES t0 50, Defendant(s). 17 18 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action may involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use □□ any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does nx 26 |! confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited

|| information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable leg 2 || principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.