Michael Harrison v. Auto Detail Supply Pros
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL HARRISON, Case No. 8:24-cv-01088-SB-KES
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
SANCTIONS AND STRIKING
AUTO DETAIL SUPPLY PROS et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT [DKT.
NO. 32]
Defendants.
Plaintiff filed a complaint May 23, 2024, raising claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California’s Unruh Act based on allegations that Defendants—Auto Detail Supply Pros, Britos Transportation Inc., Alma Alejandra Brito, Bertha Prado, and Ramon Prado—failed to maintain adequate parking facilities at a premises located at 1117 S. Main St. #D, Santa Ana, California 92707 that impeded Plaintiff’s access. Dkt. No. 6. The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and dismissed it. Dkt. No. 19. After Defendants failed to respond to the complaint as required, the clerk entered default against them on August 30 at Plaintiff’s request. Dkt. Nos. 22–27. The Court then ordered Plaintiff to file a motion for default judgment by October 4. Dkt. Nos. 28–30. Instead, on September 24, 2024, Plaintiff dismissed two defendants (Bertha Prado…