Breanna C. Webb v. Pepperdine University

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20242:24-cv-05804California1,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: CV 24-05804 WDK (RAO) Date: September 26, 2024 Title: Breanna C. Webb v. Pepperdine University

Present: The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Eddie Ramirez N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND

On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff Breanna C. Webb (“Plaintiff), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to Title VI and Title IX. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis was granted on September 3, 2024. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff’s Complaint is brought against Pepperdine University. Compl. at 1-2. For the reasons set forth below, the Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend.

I. THE SCREENING REQUIREMENT

District courts are required to screen civil complaints filed by individuals proceeding in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court may dismiss such a complaint, or a portion thereof, before service of process if the complaint:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.