Martin Calderon v. B. Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20242:24-cv-06813California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-06813-JGB (SK) Date: September 25, 2024 Title Martin Calderon v. B. Birkholz, Warden

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) SCREENING ORDER

Petitioner is a federal inmate at FCI Lompoc II claiming that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has not properly responded to some undefined set of administrative grievances over unspecified subject matter. (ECF 1 at 1, 3). It appears that Petitioner is seeking whatever relief he says he was wrongly denied during the BOP’s administrative grievance process, though nothing in the petition makes that clear. (Id. at 3). In any event, habeas relief for Petitioner is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 only for claims that would “necessarily lead to his immediate or earlier release from confinement” if the § 2241 petition were granted. Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 927 (9th Cir. 2016)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.