Brooke Egger v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20245:24-cv-01439California4,675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 || Eugene P. Ramirez (State Bar No. 134865) eugene. □□ So 2 || Lynn Carpenter (State Bar No. 310011) gin carpenter@manningkass.com ayleig! Andersen (State Bar No. 306442) Kasei .andersen@manningkass.com 4|| MANNING & KASS

ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP

5|/801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 6 || Telephone: GB) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 7 Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF 8 || RIVERSIDE; RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;

9 || Correctional Deputy R. TORRES; Correctional Deputy VILLALOBOS; 10 || Correctional Deputy M. ELENES; Correctional Deputy MICHEL; 11 || Correctional Deputy ROSE; Correctional Deputy SULTAN; Correctional Deputy 12|/M. ARREOLA; Correctional Deputy CASTRO 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

= 17 || BROOKE EGGER, Case No.: 5:24-cv-1439-SSS-DTB Plaintiffs,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

VS. ORDER; [PROPOSED| ORDER |} COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ET AL., Defendants. Action Filed: 06/03/24 22 23 24 || TO THE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.