Andre Trevone Harris v. Warren L. Montgomery
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ANDRE TREVONE HARRIS, Case No. 5:21-cv-00674-MRA-SHK
Petitioner,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, JUDGE Warden, Respondent.
17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition (“SAP”), the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected. The Report recommends denial of the SAP and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 34.) As explained below, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (ECF No. 38) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects that he is entitled to relief on his claim that hearsay evidence was erroneously admitted in violation…