Jules Falcone v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20242:24-cv-07736California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-07736-JGB-AJR Date: October 1, 2024 Page 1 of

Title: Jules Falcone v. City of Los Angeles, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COMPLAINT SHOULD

NOT BE DIMISSED AS UNTIMELY (DKT. 1)

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On September 5, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Jules Falcone (“Plaintiff”), filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (the “Complaint”) against the following Defendants: (1) City of Los Angeles; (2) Los Angeles Police Department; (3) Captain Davila; (4) Officer Ruiz; (5) Officer Villegas; (6) Officer Robledos; (7) LAPD Internal Affairs Division; (8) Officer John Doe #1; (9) Officer John Doe #2; (10) Los Angeles Parking Enforcement; (11) Officer Contreras; (12) Officer John Doe Parking Enforcement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.