Edmond Neal v. Mitage Cleaners Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-07611-MEMF-MAR EDMOND NEAL,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

MITAGE CLEANERS INC; BROOKE

INVESTMENTS, LLC; AND DOES 1 TO 10,

Defendants.

On September 6, 2024, Plaintiff EDMOND NEAL filed a Complaint against Defendants

MITAGE CLEANERS INC; BROOKE INVESTMENTS, LLC; and DOES 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the Cal. Health & Safety…