Eural Duane Debbs v. Golden Palace Assisted Living Facilities
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EURAL DUANE DEBBS, SR., Case No. CV 23-4069-DMG (AS) Plaintiff,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
v.
CONCLUSIONS AND
GOLDEN PALACE ASSISTED RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED LIVING FACILITIES, et al.,
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15 Defendants.
17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, 18 all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 19 Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and 20 Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the 21 findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 22 Plaintiff objects that he should be granted “the Legal Right to fix or repair [a]ny deficiencies 23 to this case” because he “has suffered serious harm as well as injuries [a]s a result of actions of 24 these defendants.” [Doc. # 57 at 1–2.] Plaintiff has already been afforded an opportunity, however, 25 to correct his pleading deficiencies, with…