Vladimir Royter v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20242:24-cv-06484California1,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADIMIR ROYTER, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-06484-FLA (PVCx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

17 RULING On June 4, 2024, Plaintiffs Vladimir Royter (“Mr. Royter”) and Larisa Royter (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this action against Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Defendant”) and DOES 1 through 50 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 1-1 (“Compl.”) at 4. Plaintiffs assert state-law claims for general negligence, premises liability, and loss of consortium, arising from Mr. Royter’s visit to Defendant’s store in Burbank, California, where a box allegedly fell and struck his arm. Id. On August 1, 2024, Defendant removed the action to this court based on alleged

1 The court cites the page numbers inserted by the CM/ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.