April Davis v. The Kroger Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20242:22-cv-02082California4,631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APRIL DAVIS, MAHMOOD DAWOOD, and RHIANA Case No. 2:22-cv-02082-MEMF- CALKINS, RAO

Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED v. PROTECTIVE ORDER1

THE KROGER COMPANY

DISCOVERY MATTER

Defendant.

17 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 19 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 20 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 21 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 22 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 23 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 24 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 25 26 27 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 3 B. GOOD CAUSE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.